Screening Breast Ultrasound: Where Are We Today?

Elsa M. Arribas, Gary J. Whitman, Nanette De Bruhl

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    10 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In this article, we will review the current recommendations for screening breast ultrasound along with its role as an adjunct to mammography and as a primary screening tool. We will discuss the most recent literature pertaining to breast ultrasound screening in high-risk, intermediate-risk, and average-risk women and compare it with other breast screening modalities including breast MRI, tomosynthesis or 3D mammography, and automated breast ultrasound. The current obstacles to screening breast ultrasound’s more widespread implementation will also be covered in our discussion. These will include ultrasound’s high false positive rate when compared to mammography, overdiagnosis, and cost-effectiveness. Our target audience encompasses breast surgeons, oncologists, and breast radiologists with an interest in screening breast ultrasound.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)221-229
    Number of pages9
    JournalCurrent Breast Cancer Reports
    Volume8
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

    Keywords

    • Automated breast ultrasound
    • Breast
    • Breast MRI
    • Breast cancer
    • Dense breasts
    • High risk
    • Mammography
    • Screening
    • Tomosynthesis
    • Ultrasound

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Oncology

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Screening Breast Ultrasound: Where Are We Today?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this