Selection and Prejudice: Addressing Clinical Trial Disparities With a Review of Current Shortcomings and Future Directions

Kelsey L. Corrigan, Michael K. Rooney, Ramez Kouzy, Gohar Manzar, Charles R. Thomas, Ethan B. Ludmir

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Growing evidence has demonstrated significant, persistent, and widespread disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment across myriad disease sites and target populations. Although mechanisms underlying such disparities are complex and multifactorial, clinical trial eligibility criteria may serve as a key structural barrier to equitable and diverse trial enrollment. In this review, we provide an overview of the data describing historical and current disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment and subsequently describe several patient-, institution-, and trial-related factors which appear to be key drivers of enrollment inequity, with specific discussion regarding the impact of eligibility criteria. We further describe the landscape of ongoing professional efforts aimed at eliminating clinical trial disparities through various medical, professional, and advocacy groups. The review concludes with a practical discussion of how modernization of eligibility criteria in clinical trials may decrease or eliminate trial disparities, including specific actionable recommendations aimed at improving the quality of future eligibility criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-373
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in radiation oncology
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Selection and Prejudice: Addressing Clinical Trial Disparities With a Review of Current Shortcomings and Future Directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this