Sensitivity and Specificity for Skin Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care Providers: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Educational Interventions and Diagnostic Algorithms

Nadeen Gonna, Tiffaney Tran, Roland L. Bassett, David P. Farris, Kelly C. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: In areas without convenient access to dermatology care, primary care providers (PCPs) serve as an important patient resource for early skin cancer detection. To determine the most effective strategy for skin cancer detection training in PCPs, we conducted a systematic review of educational interventions and performed a meta-analysis on sensitivity and specificity outcomes in PCPs. Objectives: To summarize data on skin cancer sensitivity and specificity outcomes for PCP-targeted training programs and diagnostic algorithms. Our PCP cohort included practicing physicians, trainee physicians, and advanced practice practitioners. Methods: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant English-language articles published worldwide from 2000 onward. Results were screened for eligibility, and overlapping datasets were reconciled. Data extracted included the educational intervention, diagnostic algorithm, and outcomes of interest (sensitivity and specificity). Outcomes were pooled across interventions that taught the same diagnostic algorithm. A bivariate model was fit to compare different interventions/algorithms. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Results: In total, 21 articles were included in this review, encompassing over 58,610 assessments of skin lesions by about 1529 participants worldwide. Training programs that implemented the triage-amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) demonstrated high pooled sensitivity (91.7%) and high pooled specificity (81.4%) among PCPs. Conclusions and Relevance: Overall, this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that dermoscopy training in PCPs was generally associated with gains in skin cancer sensitivity without loss of specificity. Clinically, this correlates with fewer skin cancers overlooked by PCPs and fewer excisions of benign lesions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1563-1572
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cancer Education
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Advanced practice practitioner
  • Early detection
  • Melanoma
  • Meta-analysis
  • Nurse practitioner
  • Physician assistant
  • Primary care provider
  • Secondary prevention
  • Sensitivity
  • Skin cancer
  • Skin cancer detection
  • Skin cancer diagnosis
  • Skin cancer education
  • Specificity
  • Systematic literature review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity and Specificity for Skin Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care Providers: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Educational Interventions and Diagnostic Algorithms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this