Subcutaneous urinary diversion utilizing a nephrovesical stent: A superior alternative to long-term external drainage?

Stephen Y. Nakada, Adam J. Gerber, J. Stuart Wolf, Marshall E. Hicks, Daniel Picus, Ralph V. Clayman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The use of external percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in patients with end-stage ureteral obstruction in whom ureteral stenting has failed presents significant compromises in the patient's quality of life. Toward this end, we present the initial experience in the United States with an intracorporeal nephrovesical stent. Methods: We performed successful subcutaneous urinary diversion in 2 patients with malignant, metastatic periureteral obstruction. Both patients had previously been managed with a chronic percutaneous nephrostomy that was both painful and inconvenient. The nephrovesical stent was inserted utilizing percutaneous access to both the kidney and bladder followed by creation of a subcutaneous tunnel between the two sites. Results: The nephrovesical stents are patent at 6 and 9 weeks postoperatively and both patients have had their nephrostomy tubes removed. Both patients have noted a marked improvement in their overall comfort and quality of life since the stent has been in place. Conclusions: Subcutaneous urinary diversion with a nephrovesical stent provides effective urinary drainage and may improve the quality of life of patients with malignant metastatic ureteral obstruction. Further long-term studies are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)538-541
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1995
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subcutaneous urinary diversion utilizing a nephrovesical stent: A superior alternative to long-term external drainage?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this