Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Autologous versus Implant-Based Reconstruction following Infected Breast Device Explantation

Malke Asaad, Cedar Slovacek, David Mitchell, Jun Liu, Jesse C. Selber, Mark W. Clemens, Carrie K. Chu, Alexander F. Mericli, Charles E. Butler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Implant-based breast reconstruction infections often require implant explantation. Whereas some plastic surgeons pursue autologous reconstruction following the first implant-based breast reconstruction failure caused by infection, others argue that a second attempt is acceptable. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent a second reconstruction attempt with implant-based or free flap breast reconstruction following explantation because of infection between 2006 and 2019. Surgical and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 6093 implant-based breast reconstructions were performed during the study period, of which 130 breasts met our inclusion criteria [implant-based, n = 86 (66 percent); free flap, n = 44 (34 percent)]. No significant differences in rates of overall (25 percent versus 36 percent; p = 0.2) or major (20 percent versus 21 percent; p = 0.95) complications were identified between the free flap and implant-based cohorts, respectively. Implant-based breast reconstruction patients were more likely to experience a second infection (27 percent versus 2 percent; p = 0.0007) and reconstruction failure (21 percent versus 5 percent; p = 0.019). Among irradiated patients, reconstruction failure was reported in 44 percent of the implant-based and 7 percent of the free flap cohorts (p = 0.02). Free flap patients reported significantly higher scores for Satisfaction with Breasts (73.7 ± 20.1 versus 48.5 ± 27.9; p = 0.0046). Conclusions: Following implant-based breast reconstruction explantation because of infection, implant-based and free flap breast reconstruction had similar rates of overall and major complications; however, implant-based breast reconstruction had considerably higher rates of infection and reconstructive failures and lower patient-reported scores for Satisfaction with Breasts. Given the high rates of implant-based breast reconstruction failure in patients with prior radiotherapy and infection-based failure, plastic surgeons should strongly consider autologous reconstruction in this patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1080E-1089E
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume149
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Autologous versus Implant-Based Reconstruction following Infected Breast Device Explantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this