Surgical outcomes with subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation in very young children

Michael S. Cohen, Austin Y. Ha, Dennis J. Kitsko, David H. Chi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: As data continue to emerge demonstrating improved hearing outcomes associated with younger age at time of cochlear implantation, more children aged 12 months or younger are undergoing this procedure. Drilling a well to house the cochlear implant receiver/stimulator (R/S) may carry an increased risk in this group of patients as the calvarium is thin and drilling an adequate well may require exposure of the underlying dura. Our group has employed a technique in this age group which involves securing the R/S in a subperiosteal pocket without creating a bony well. We report our experience with six infants 12 months of age or younger undergoing cochlear implantation with the subperiosteal pocket technique. Methods: Cases were identified by searching an IRB approved research registry. Charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Six patients 12 months of age or younger underwent cochlear implantation over a one year period. Simultaneous bilateral implantation was performed in all cases, for a total of 12 implanted ears. The average age at time of implantation was 9.8 months (SD 2.1 months). There were no postoperative wound complications. No evidence of device migration was noted in any patient as of the most recent follow-up appointment. There was one device hard failure at 32 months. Average length of follow-up was 28.4 months (SD 13.8 months). Conclusions: No wound complications or device migrations occurred in 12 cochlear implantations in six children aged 12 months or younger. Advantages of this technique include no risk to the dura in this location, smaller incisions, and shorter surgical time. A potential disadvantage is the increased device profile from the lack of a well. New thinner implant designs may minimize this concern. Further prospective study is justified to confirm our initial experience in this small group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1545-1547
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume78
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cochlear implants
  • Hearing loss
  • Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical outcomes with subperiosteal pocket technique for cochlear implantation in very young children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this