Survival and clinical outcomes in surgically treated patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: Results of the prospective multicenter AOSpine study

Michael G. Fehlings, Anick Nater, Lindsay Tetreault, Branko Kopjar, Paul Arnold, Mark Dekutoski, Joel Finkelstein, Charles Fisher, John France, Ziya Gokaslan, Eric Massicotte, Laurence Rhines, Peter Rose, Arjun Sahgal, James Schuster, Alexander Vaccaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

163 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Although surgery is used increasingly as a strategy to complement treatment with radiation and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), the impact of surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is not well established. We aimed to prospectively evaluate survival, neurologic, functional, and HRQoL outcomes in patients with MESCC who underwent surgical management. Patients and Methods: One hundred forty-two patients with a single symptomatic MESCC lesion who were treated surgically were enrolled onto a prospective North American multicenter study and were observed at least up to 12 months. Clinical data, including Brief Pain Inventory, ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) impairment scale, SF-36 Short Form Health Survey, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) scores, were obtained preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Median survival time was 7.7 months. The 30-day and 12-month mortality rates were 9% and 62%, respectively. There was improvement at 6 months postoperatively for ambulatory status (McNemar test, P < .001), lower extremity and total motor scores (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P < .001), and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months for Oswestry Disability Index, EQ-5D, and pain interference (paired t test, P < .013). Moreover, at 3 months after surgery, the ASIA impairment scale grade was improved (Stuart-Maxwell test P = .004). SF-36 scores improved postoperatively in six of eight scales. The incidence of wound complications was 10% and 2 patients required a second surgery (screw malposition and epidural hematoma). Conclusion: Surgical intervention, as an adjunct to radiation and chemotherapy, provides immediate and sustained improvement in pain, neurologic, functional, and HRQoL outcomes, with acceptable risks in patients with a focal symptomatic MESCC lesion who have at least a 3 month survival prognosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-276
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 20 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survival and clinical outcomes in surgically treated patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: Results of the prospective multicenter AOSpine study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this