Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Surgical Inguinal Nodal Staging in Penile Carcinoma

Isabella Greco, Sergio Fernandez-Pello, Vasileios I. Sakalis, Lenka Barreto, Maarten Albersen, Benjamin Ayres, Tiago Antunes Lopes, Riccardo Campi, Juanita Crook, Herney A. García Perdomo, Peter A.S. Johnstone, Mithun Kailavasan, Kenneth Manzie, Jack David Marcus, Andrea Necchi, Pedro Oliveira, John Osborne, Lance C. Pagliaro, Arie S. Parnham, Curtis A. PettawayChris Protzel, R. Bryan Rumble, Ashwin Sachdeva, Diego F. Sanchez Martinez, Łukasz Zapala, Scott T. Tagawa, Philippe E. Spiess, Oscar R. Brouwer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: There are several procedures for surgical nodal staging in clinically node-negative (cN0) penile carcinoma. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, perioperative outcomes, and complications of minimally invasive surgical procedures for nodal staging in penile carcinoma. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane controlled trials databases and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted. Published and ongoing studies reporting on the management of cN0 penile cancer were included without any design restriction. Outcomes included the false negative (FN) rate, the number of nodes removed, surgical time, and postoperative complications. Evidence synthesis: Forty-one studies were eligible for inclusion. Four studies comparing robot-assisted (RA-VEIL) and video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) to open inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) were suitable for meta-analysis. A descriptive synthesis was performed for single-arm studies on modified open ILND, dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) with and without preoperative inguinal ultrasound (US), and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). DSNB with US + FNAC had lower FN rates (3.5–22% vs 0–42.9%) and complication rates (Clavien Dindo grade I–II: 1.1–20% vs 2.9-11.9%; grade III–V: 0–6.8% vs 0–9.4%) in comparison to DSNB alone. Favourable results were observed for VEIL/RA-VEIL over open ILND in terms of major complications (2–10.6% vs 6.9–40.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.18; p < 0.01). Overall, VEIL/RA-VEIL had lower wound-related complication rates (OR 0.14; p < 0.01), including wound infections (OR 0.229; p < 0.01) and skin necrosis (OR 0.16; p < 0.01). The incidence of lymphatic complications varied between 20.6% and 49%. Conclusions: Of all the surgical staging options, DSNB with inguinal US + FNAC had the lowest complication rates and high diagnostic accuracy, especially when performed in high-volume centres. If DSNB is not available, favourable results were also found for VEIL/RA-VEIL over open ILND. Lymphatic-related complications were comparable across open and video-endoscopic ILND. Patient summary: We reviewed studies on different surgical approaches for assessing lymph node involvement in cases with penile cancer. The results show that a technique called dynamic sentinel node biopsy with ultrasound guidance and fine-needle sampling has high diagnostic accuracy and low complication rates. For lymph node dissection in penile cancer cases, a minimally invasive approach may offer favourable postoperative outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Urology Focus
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • Meta-analysis
  • Minimally invasive
  • Nodal staging
  • Penile cancer
  • Surgical procedures
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Surgical Inguinal Nodal Staging in Penile Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this