TY - JOUR
T1 - Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
AU - Kuntz, Michael
AU - Leiva-Juarez, Miguel M.
AU - Luthra, Suvitesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Background: There are currently three Food and Drug Administration approved endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs): bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan. There is a growing body of evidence that demonstrates the beneficial effects of ERAs in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Objectives: To compare the available evidence from randomized clinical trials for specific outcomes of different endothelin antagonists for the treatment of PAH. Methods: A multi-database search of randomized controlled trials up to March 15, 2016 was conducted for those that would measure functional parameters of patients with PAH treated with ERA monotherapy versus placebo. Studies that analyzed 6-min walking distance, pulmonary vascular resistance, pulmonary arterial pressure, or WHO functional status were incorporated for analysis. A total of 15 trials and 2 subanalyses were compiled and quality and abovementioned outcomes were compared among studies. Results: A constant decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure was globally reported among the different studies, resulting in increased 6-min walking distance and functional status compared to placebo. Conclusions: Although this evidence clearly shows the benefit of ERAs, studies, which compare ERAs against one another and with other therapies for progressive PAH, have been lacking. Larger and longer studies are necessary to define the role of ERAs as standalone agents and in combination therapies.
AB - Background: There are currently three Food and Drug Administration approved endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs): bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan. There is a growing body of evidence that demonstrates the beneficial effects of ERAs in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Objectives: To compare the available evidence from randomized clinical trials for specific outcomes of different endothelin antagonists for the treatment of PAH. Methods: A multi-database search of randomized controlled trials up to March 15, 2016 was conducted for those that would measure functional parameters of patients with PAH treated with ERA monotherapy versus placebo. Studies that analyzed 6-min walking distance, pulmonary vascular resistance, pulmonary arterial pressure, or WHO functional status were incorporated for analysis. A total of 15 trials and 2 subanalyses were compiled and quality and abovementioned outcomes were compared among studies. Results: A constant decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure was globally reported among the different studies, resulting in increased 6-min walking distance and functional status compared to placebo. Conclusions: Although this evidence clearly shows the benefit of ERAs, studies, which compare ERAs against one another and with other therapies for progressive PAH, have been lacking. Larger and longer studies are necessary to define the role of ERAs as standalone agents and in combination therapies.
KW - Ambrisentan
KW - Bosentan
KW - Endothelin antagonists
KW - Macitentan
KW - Pulmonary arterial hypertension
KW - Sitaxsentan
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981194130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981194130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00408-016-9928-6
DO - 10.1007/s00408-016-9928-6
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27506903
AN - SCOPUS:84981194130
SN - 0341-2040
VL - 194
SP - 723
EP - 732
JO - Lung
JF - Lung
IS - 5
ER -