TY - JOUR
T1 - The current state of robotic retromuscular repairs—a qualitative review of the literature
AU - Santos, David A.
AU - Limmer, Angela R.
AU - Gibson, Heather M.
AU - Ledet, Celia R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Background: The management of ventral incisional hernias (VIH) has undergone many iterations over the last 5 years due to evolution in surgical techniques and advancement in robotic surgery. Four general principles have emerged: mesh usage, retromuscular mesh placement, primary fascial closure, and usage of minimally invasive techniques when possible. The application of robotic retromuscular repairs in VIH allow these principles to be applied simultaneously. This qualitative review attempts to answer what robotic retromuscular repairs are described, which patients are selected for these techniques, and what are current outcomes. Methods: Using the key words: “robotic retromuscular repair”, “robotic Rives Stoppa”, and “robotic transversus abdominis release”, a PubMed search of articles written up to December 2019 was critically reviewed. Results: 44 articles were encountered, 9 high-quality articles were analyzed for this manuscript. Level of evidence ranged from 2B to 2C. Robotic TAR patients had BMI of 33 kg/m2, defect sizes ranging from 7–14 cm wide to 12–19 cm long, longer OR times, no difference in surgical site events, and shorter length of stay (LOS). The techniques to perform robotic Rives Stoppa (RS) were heterogeneous; however, extended totally extraperitoneal (ETEP) approach is most described. Defect width for RS repairs ranged 4–7 cm and LOS was less than 1 day. Complication rates were low, there is no long-term data on hernia recurrence, and information on cost is limited. Conclusion: In short-term follow-up, robotic retromuscular repairs show promise that VIH can be repaired with intramuscular mesh, few complications, and shorter LOS. Data on hernia recurrence, long-term complications, and rigorous cost analysis are needed to demonstrate generalizability.
AB - Background: The management of ventral incisional hernias (VIH) has undergone many iterations over the last 5 years due to evolution in surgical techniques and advancement in robotic surgery. Four general principles have emerged: mesh usage, retromuscular mesh placement, primary fascial closure, and usage of minimally invasive techniques when possible. The application of robotic retromuscular repairs in VIH allow these principles to be applied simultaneously. This qualitative review attempts to answer what robotic retromuscular repairs are described, which patients are selected for these techniques, and what are current outcomes. Methods: Using the key words: “robotic retromuscular repair”, “robotic Rives Stoppa”, and “robotic transversus abdominis release”, a PubMed search of articles written up to December 2019 was critically reviewed. Results: 44 articles were encountered, 9 high-quality articles were analyzed for this manuscript. Level of evidence ranged from 2B to 2C. Robotic TAR patients had BMI of 33 kg/m2, defect sizes ranging from 7–14 cm wide to 12–19 cm long, longer OR times, no difference in surgical site events, and shorter length of stay (LOS). The techniques to perform robotic Rives Stoppa (RS) were heterogeneous; however, extended totally extraperitoneal (ETEP) approach is most described. Defect width for RS repairs ranged 4–7 cm and LOS was less than 1 day. Complication rates were low, there is no long-term data on hernia recurrence, and information on cost is limited. Conclusion: In short-term follow-up, robotic retromuscular repairs show promise that VIH can be repaired with intramuscular mesh, few complications, and shorter LOS. Data on hernia recurrence, long-term complications, and rigorous cost analysis are needed to demonstrate generalizability.
KW - ETEP
KW - Robotic retromuscular
KW - TAR
KW - Ventral hernia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090974014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090974014&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-020-07957-y
DO - 10.1007/s00464-020-07957-y
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32926251
AN - SCOPUS:85090974014
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 35
SP - 456
EP - 466
JO - Surgical endoscopy
JF - Surgical endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -