TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of dietary fiber on bowel function following radical hysterectomy
T2 - A randomized trial
AU - Griffenberg, Laura
AU - Morris, Mitchell
AU - Atkinson, Nealy
AU - Levenback, Charles
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Kellogg Company for donating the All-Bran cereal, Vickie Williams for editorial expertise, and Pat Pillow for assistance with computerized nutrient analysis. The work was support by grants from Business and Professional Women and the University Cancer Foundation.
PY - 1997/9
Y1 - 1997/9
N2 - Objective. To assess the effect of high-fiber dietary instruction in relieving chronic constipation, a known and accepted complication of radical hysterectomy (RH). Methods. Thirty-five women with a diagnosis of cervical cancer who were scheduled for RH were randomized into groups that followed either a high-fiber diet plan or their usual diet. Data were gathered using a validated subjective bowel function questionnaire (SBFQ); a typical day's intake form and food frequency tool; and a diary used to record food, medication, bowel, and exercise information. Patients were evaluated at 1, 4, and 7 months after surgery. Results. Postoperatively, the dietary fiber intake was significantly higher for the treatment (T) group (22.9 g) than the control (C) group (12.4 g) (P = 0.007). With regard to intergroup comparisons, there were few differences at the first follow-up. By the second visit, the T group reported taking medications to achieve regularity less often (P = 0.0269), straining less often (P = 0.0210), having pain with bowel movement (BM) less often (P = 0.0116), and having crampy abdominal pain less often (P = 0.123) than the C group. Four significant positive changes occurred in the T group, whereas only one occurred in the C group. With regard to intragroup comparison, the significant changes in bowel function in the T group were generally positive, whereas all of the C group's significant changes were negative. According to summary questions on the SBFQ, the T group reported a significant change in the frequency of BM (P = 0.0096); however, the C group reported no significant changes. Analysis of bowel function records showed clearer differences. The T group took less time to defecate (P < 0.001) but had more BMs accompanied by gas (P < 0.001). The C group had significantly more BMs with cramps (P < 0.001), straining (P < 0.001), and retention (P < 0.001) and significantly more BMs, which were hard (P < 0.001). Two C patients dropped out of the study because of severe bowel dysfunction despite maximum medication. Conclusion. Dietary management seems to be an inexpensive effective therapeutic intervention for addressing bowel dysfunction associated with RH.
AB - Objective. To assess the effect of high-fiber dietary instruction in relieving chronic constipation, a known and accepted complication of radical hysterectomy (RH). Methods. Thirty-five women with a diagnosis of cervical cancer who were scheduled for RH were randomized into groups that followed either a high-fiber diet plan or their usual diet. Data were gathered using a validated subjective bowel function questionnaire (SBFQ); a typical day's intake form and food frequency tool; and a diary used to record food, medication, bowel, and exercise information. Patients were evaluated at 1, 4, and 7 months after surgery. Results. Postoperatively, the dietary fiber intake was significantly higher for the treatment (T) group (22.9 g) than the control (C) group (12.4 g) (P = 0.007). With regard to intergroup comparisons, there were few differences at the first follow-up. By the second visit, the T group reported taking medications to achieve regularity less often (P = 0.0269), straining less often (P = 0.0210), having pain with bowel movement (BM) less often (P = 0.0116), and having crampy abdominal pain less often (P = 0.123) than the C group. Four significant positive changes occurred in the T group, whereas only one occurred in the C group. With regard to intragroup comparison, the significant changes in bowel function in the T group were generally positive, whereas all of the C group's significant changes were negative. According to summary questions on the SBFQ, the T group reported a significant change in the frequency of BM (P = 0.0096); however, the C group reported no significant changes. Analysis of bowel function records showed clearer differences. The T group took less time to defecate (P < 0.001) but had more BMs accompanied by gas (P < 0.001). The C group had significantly more BMs with cramps (P < 0.001), straining (P < 0.001), and retention (P < 0.001) and significantly more BMs, which were hard (P < 0.001). Two C patients dropped out of the study because of severe bowel dysfunction despite maximum medication. Conclusion. Dietary management seems to be an inexpensive effective therapeutic intervention for addressing bowel dysfunction associated with RH.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031239898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031239898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/gyno.1997.4797
DO - 10.1006/gyno.1997.4797
M3 - Article
C2 - 9299255
AN - SCOPUS:0031239898
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 66
SP - 417
EP - 424
JO - Gynecologic oncology
JF - Gynecologic oncology
IS - 3
ER -