The integrity of authorship: Doing the right thing

Raphael E. Pollock; Michael S. Ewer

doi:10.1002/cncr.25268

The integrity of authorship: Doing the right thing

Raphael E. Pollock, Michael S. Ewer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Submissions to peer-reviewed publications sometimes involve contributions that are financed by industry in ways that that could interfere with the objectivity of the submission. The authors of this commentary consider it essential that all submissions to peer-reviewed journals be accompanied by full acknowledgements of such contributions so as to insure that those involved in the editorial process as well as the readers of the final published version of an article are fully informed regarding any relationship that could influence objectivity. The authors examined the balance between industry support of a publication and the integrity of authorship.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	3986-3987
Number of pages	2
Journal	Cancer
Volume	116
Issue number	17
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25268
State	Published - Sep 1 2010

Keywords

Authorship
Conflict of interest
External influence
Ghostwriting
Peer review process

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Oncology
Cancer Research

Access to Document

10.1002/cncr.25268

Cite this

@article{ac037cf9e0744e23971ce5ba7343d94b,

title = "The integrity of authorship: Doing the right thing",

abstract = "Submissions to peer-reviewed publications sometimes involve contributions that are financed by industry in ways that that could interfere with the objectivity of the submission. The authors of this commentary consider it essential that all submissions to peer-reviewed journals be accompanied by full acknowledgements of such contributions so as to insure that those involved in the editorial process as well as the readers of the final published version of an article are fully informed regarding any relationship that could influence objectivity. The authors examined the balance between industry support of a publication and the integrity of authorship.",

keywords = "Authorship, Conflict of interest, External influence, Ghostwriting, Peer review process",

author = "Pollock, {Raphael E.} and Ewer, {Michael S.}",

year = "2010",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/cncr.25268",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "116",

pages = "3986--3987",

journal = "Cancer",

issn = "0008-543X",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The integrity of authorship

T2 - Doing the right thing

AU - Pollock, Raphael E.

AU - Ewer, Michael S.

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - Submissions to peer-reviewed publications sometimes involve contributions that are financed by industry in ways that that could interfere with the objectivity of the submission. The authors of this commentary consider it essential that all submissions to peer-reviewed journals be accompanied by full acknowledgements of such contributions so as to insure that those involved in the editorial process as well as the readers of the final published version of an article are fully informed regarding any relationship that could influence objectivity. The authors examined the balance between industry support of a publication and the integrity of authorship.

AB - Submissions to peer-reviewed publications sometimes involve contributions that are financed by industry in ways that that could interfere with the objectivity of the submission. The authors of this commentary consider it essential that all submissions to peer-reviewed journals be accompanied by full acknowledgements of such contributions so as to insure that those involved in the editorial process as well as the readers of the final published version of an article are fully informed regarding any relationship that could influence objectivity. The authors examined the balance between industry support of a publication and the integrity of authorship.

KW - Authorship

KW - Conflict of interest

KW - External influence

KW - Ghostwriting

KW - Peer review process

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956839387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956839387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.25268

DO - 10.1002/cncr.25268

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 20564144

AN - SCOPUS:77956839387

SN - 0008-543X

VL - 116

SP - 3986

EP - 3987

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

IS - 17

ER -

The integrity of authorship: Doing the right thing

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this