Abstract
It is widely believed that hemopoietic stem cells have to be mobilized from extravascular sites into the circulation to guarantee a sufficient and safe blood stem cell autograft. The question of using mobilized or non-mobilized stem cells for transplantation purposes addresses the quality of hemopoietic engraftment rather than its feasibility. Two aspects are of clinical relevance: 1. The increment of peripheral cell concentration per time, and 2. shortening the duration of total aplasia following myeloablation and stem cell transplantation. When comparing the various stem cell mobilization techniques the CFU-GM yield per apheresis was highest during rh GM-CSF application (250 micrograms/m2/day continuous i.v. infusion), whereas the MNC yield was not greatly affected. More severe side effects were seen during rh GM-CSF infusion: One patient experienced an axillary phlebothrombosis. In a series of 15 advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma patients the reconstitutive ability of the various stem cell autografts, whether chemotherapy-, cytokine-, or non-mobilized, did not vary. Particularly in acute leukemias, mobilization of hemopoietic precursor cells does not necessarily exclude a concomitant mobilization of clonogenic tumor cells, and, therefore, the probability of disease-free survival after ABSCT might be lower when using mobilized stem cells for transplant.
Translated title of the contribution | The role of stem cell mobilization in the scope of autologous blood stem cell transplantation |
---|---|
Original language | German |
Pages (from-to) | 233-241 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Beiträge zur Infusionstherapie = Contributions to infusion therapy |
Volume | 28 |
State | Published - 1991 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine