To have done everything

Rosalie A. Looijaard, Nico Nortjé

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When a patient loses decisional capacity, the responsibility to make treatment decisions often falls on a family member who becomes the surrogate decision­maker. This case study provides an example of a situation where the medical team and the surrogate decision­maker initially disagreed on the best course of action for the patient. The ethicist was called in to lead a guided conversation to help the team and the surrogate decision­maker reach a consensus. This case illustrates the importance of allowing the surrogate decision­maker to ask clarifying questions and process their emotions before making a decision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-240
Number of pages4
JournalIndian journal of medical ethics
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Keywords

  • clinical ethics
  • guided conversation
  • inappropriate treatment
  • intensive care unit
  • surrogate decision­making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To have done everything'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this