Trends in meat consumption in the USA

Carrie R. Daniel, Amanda J. Cross, Corinna Koebnick, Rashmi Sinha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

363 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To characterize the trends, distribution, potential determinants and public health implications of meat consumption within the USA. Design We examined temporal trends in meat consumption using food availability data from the FAO and US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and further evaluated the meat intake by type (red, white, processed) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) linked to the MyPyramid Equivalents Database (MPED). Results Overall meat consumption has continued to rise in the USA and the rest of the developed world. Despite a shift towards higher poultry consumption, red meat still represents the largest proportion of meat consumed in the USA (58 %). Twenty-two per cent of the meat consumed in the USA is processed. According to the NHANES 2003-2004, total meat intake averaged 128 g/d. The type and quantities of meat reported varied by education, race, age and gender. Conclusions Given the plausible epidemiological evidence for red and processed meat intake in cancer and chronic disease risk, understanding the trends and determinants of meat consumption in the USA, where meat is consumed at more than three times the global average, should be particularly pertinent to researchers and other public health professionals aiming to reduce the global burden of chronic disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)575-583
Number of pages9
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chronic disease
  • Poultry
  • Processed meat
  • Red meat
  • US diet

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in meat consumption in the USA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this