Tumorigenicity and metastatic behavior in nude mice of two human squamous cell carcinoma lines that differ in production of the cytokine ETAF/IL-1

Janet E. Price, Daniel N. Sauder, Isaiah J. Fidler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of these studies was to determine whether the production of the cytokine epidermal cell thymocyte-activating factor (ETAF) by human squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cells correlated with their tumorigenicity and metastatic potential in athymic nude mice. Cells of the human SCC line A431 produced rapidly growing subcutaneous tumors, few experimental lung metastases, and low levels of ETAF activity in vitro. In contrast, cells of the SCC Colo-16 line produced slower growing subcutaneous tumors, high numbers of experimental lung metastases, and a high level of ETAF activity in culture supernatants. The apparent relationship between production of ETAF and experimental metastasis formation was not consistent. Clonal populations of the SCC A431 and Colo-16 were isolated in vitro. The clones of Colo-16 varied in their ability to produce experimental metastases and in production of ETAF in vitro. However, the levels of ETAF production did not correlate with the propensity of the SCC cells to produce experimental metastases. We conclude that while the growth and metastasis of human SCC in nude mice may benefit from production of the cytokine ETAF, the ETAF production per se is not invariably linked with the capability of the SCC cells to metastasize.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)258-262
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Investigative Dermatology
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1988

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Dermatology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tumorigenicity and metastatic behavior in nude mice of two human squamous cell carcinoma lines that differ in production of the cytokine ETAF/IL-1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this