TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasonography for the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma
T2 - A review of prospective trials
AU - Pearl, W. S.
AU - Todd, K. H.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Many trauma centers are considering the addition of diagnostic ultrasonography to their trauma protocols. However, a diagnostic imaging application should not be used in general clinical practice until its efficacy has been demonstrated. A literature search was conducted for prospective trials on the use of ultrasound in evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. Each study was evaluated with the use of an efficacy assessment model. Within this framework, clinical outcomes were classified according to the following efficacy assessment parameters: technical capacity, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic effect, therapeutic effect, and patient outcome. This model also provided a systematic process for grading the quality of research methods used to obtain each outcome. Eleven trials were found that fulfilled the study criteria, and all of them concluded that ultrasound was valuable for assessment of blunt intraperitoneal trauma. Frequent methodologic flaws were detected in these studies. None of these trials determined therapeutic effect or patient outcome. The criteria for clinical efficacy were not fulfilled. Additional trials should be conducted before ultrasound is accepted as a standard diagnostic test for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.
AB - Many trauma centers are considering the addition of diagnostic ultrasonography to their trauma protocols. However, a diagnostic imaging application should not be used in general clinical practice until its efficacy has been demonstrated. A literature search was conducted for prospective trials on the use of ultrasound in evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. Each study was evaluated with the use of an efficacy assessment model. Within this framework, clinical outcomes were classified according to the following efficacy assessment parameters: technical capacity, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic effect, therapeutic effect, and patient outcome. This model also provided a systematic process for grading the quality of research methods used to obtain each outcome. Eleven trials were found that fulfilled the study criteria, and all of them concluded that ultrasound was valuable for assessment of blunt intraperitoneal trauma. Frequent methodologic flaws were detected in these studies. None of these trials determined therapeutic effect or patient outcome. The criteria for clinical efficacy were not fulfilled. Additional trials should be conducted before ultrasound is accepted as a standard diagnostic test for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029959916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029959916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70273-1
DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70273-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 8599497
AN - SCOPUS:0029959916
SN - 0196-0644
VL - 27
SP - 353
EP - 361
JO - Annals of emergency medicine
JF - Annals of emergency medicine
IS - 3
ER -