Uptake of tamoxifen in consecutive premenopausal women under surveillance in a high-risk breast cancer clinic: Donnelly LS, Evans DG, Wiseman J, et al (Univ Hosp of South Manchester, UK; Et al) Br J Cancer 110:1681-1687, 2014

S. Day, T. B. Bevers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. -Randomised trials of tamoxifen versus placebo indicate that tamoxifen reduces breast cancer risk by approximately 33%, yet uptake is low. Approximately 10% of women in our clinic entered the IBIS-I prevention trial. We assess the uptake of tamoxifen in a consecutive series of premenopausal women not in a trial and explore the reasons for uptake through interviews. Methods. -All eligible women between 33 and 46 years at $17% lifetime risk of breast cancer and undergoing annual mammography in our service were invited to take a 5-year course of tamoxifen. Reasons for accepting (n 1/4 15) or declining (n 1/4 15) were explored using semistructured interviews. Results. -Of 1279 eligible women, 136 (10.6%) decided to take tamoxifen. Women >40 years (74 out of 553 (13.4%)) and those at higher non- BRCA-associated risk were more likely to accept tamoxifen (129 out of 1109 (11.6%)). Interviews highlighted four themes surrounding decision making: perceived impact of side effects, the impact of other's experience on beliefs about tamoxifen, tamoxifen as a 'cancer drug', and daily reminder of cancer risk. Conclusions. -Tamoxifen uptake was similar to previously ascertained uptake in a randomised controlled trial (IBIS-I). Concerns were similar in women who did or did not accept tamoxifen. Decision making appeared to be embedded in the experience of significant others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-130
Number of pages3
JournalBreast Diseases
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Uptake of tamoxifen in consecutive premenopausal women under surveillance in a high-risk breast cancer clinic: Donnelly LS, Evans DG, Wiseman J, et al (Univ Hosp of South Manchester, UK; Et al) Br J Cancer 110:1681-1687, 2014'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this