Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial

Andrew H. Wei, Pau Montesinos, Vladimir Ivanov, Courtney D. DiNardo, Jan Novak, Kamel Laribi, Inho Kim, Don A. Stevens, Walter Fiedler, Maria Pagoni, Olga Samoilova, Yu Hu, Achilles Anagnostopoulos, Julie Bergeron, Jing Zhou Hou, Vidhya Murthy, Takahiro Yamauchi, Andrew McDonald, Brenda Chyla, Sathej GopalakrishnanQi Jiang, Wellington Mendes, John Hayslip, Panayiotis Panayiotidis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

449 Scopus citations

Abstract

Effective treatment options are limited for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. Adults age 18 years with newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled in this international phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients (N 5 211) were randomized 2:1 to venetoclax (n 5 143) or placebo (n 5 68) in 28-day cycles, plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) on days 1 to 10. Primary end pointwas overall survival (OS); secondary end points included response rate, transfusion independence, and event-free survival. Median age was 76 years (range, 36-93 years), 38% had secondary AML, and 20% had received prior hypomethylating agent treatment. Planned primary analysis showed a 25%reduction in risk of deathwith venetoclax plus LDAC vs LDAC alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-1.07; P 5 .11), although not statistically significant; median OS was 7.2 vs 4.1 months, respectively. Unplanned analysis with additional 6-month follow-up demonstrated median OS of 8.4months for the venetoclax arm(HR, 0.70; 95%CI, 0.50-0.98; P5.04). Complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery rates were 48% and 13% for venetoclax plus LDAC and LDAC alone, respectively. Key grade 3 adverse events (venetoclax vs LDAC alone) were febrile neutropenia (32% vs 29%), neutropenia (47% vs 16%), and thrombocytopenia (45% vs 37%). Venetoclax plus LDAC demonstrates clinically meaningful improvement in remission rate and OS vs LDAC alone, with a manageable safety profile. Results confirm venetoclax plus LDAC as an important frontline treatment for AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2137-2145
Number of pages9
JournalBlood
Volume135
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this