When is it justified to treat symptoms? Measuring symptom burden.

Charles S. Cleeland, Cielito C. Reyes-Gibby

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Symptom burden is certainly not a new concept in the literature on disease and treatment, but recent developments in our understanding of how to measure symptoms and their impact make it possible to cast symptom burden as a reasonable summary measure of both disease-and treatment-outcome status. We discuss the use of symptom burden as an alternative to quality-of-life measures or as a supplement to these measures. We examine the potential responsiveness and relative ease of interpretation of a symptom-burden outcome. We review studies of the prevalence and negative impact of multiple symptoms on health outcomes among cancer patients. By way of example, we illustrate the potential utility of a measure of symptom burden in the epidemiologic studies of multiple symptoms as well as an outcome measure in clinical studies. Finally, we discuss potential research challenges and offer recommendations on future research directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-70
Number of pages7
JournalOncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)
Volume16
Issue number9 Suppl 10
StatePublished - 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When is it justified to treat symptoms? Measuring symptom burden.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this