TY - JOUR
T1 - Works-in-progress
T2 - Guiding junior scientists through career development applications
AU - Chang, Shine
AU - Hughes, Daniel C.
AU - Chamberlain, Robert M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Hughes was supported by The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Education Program in Cancer Prevention grant (R25 CA 57730) from the National Cancer Institute (PI: Chamberlain; co-PI: Chang).
PY - 2008/7
Y1 - 2008/7
N2 - Background. Career development awards are important to the professional careers of many junior scientists. Designed to launch researchers as independent scientists earlier in their careers, such grants release them from full schedules of teaching and clinical service, protecting their time for research and publishing. Yet few know how best to embark on this crucial endeavor. Methods. We pilot tested a faculty-facilitated, biweekly working group for postdoctoral fellows and junior faculty preparing career development applications. Based on their needs and interests, sessions included didactic activities, structured panel discussions, identification of resources, and individual guidance. For those unable to attend regularly, e-mail kept them informed of information shared and lessons learned, as summarized by participants on a rotating basis. Results. Although success in terms of funded applications is yet unknown, preliminary evaluation suggests high satisfaction among the participants. Conclusions. Ultimately, if successful, a low-cost, easy-to-administer working group approach such as this can add great value to any training program.
AB - Background. Career development awards are important to the professional careers of many junior scientists. Designed to launch researchers as independent scientists earlier in their careers, such grants release them from full schedules of teaching and clinical service, protecting their time for research and publishing. Yet few know how best to embark on this crucial endeavor. Methods. We pilot tested a faculty-facilitated, biweekly working group for postdoctoral fellows and junior faculty preparing career development applications. Based on their needs and interests, sessions included didactic activities, structured panel discussions, identification of resources, and individual guidance. For those unable to attend regularly, e-mail kept them informed of information shared and lessons learned, as summarized by participants on a rotating basis. Results. Although success in terms of funded applications is yet unknown, preliminary evaluation suggests high satisfaction among the participants. Conclusions. Ultimately, if successful, a low-cost, easy-to-administer working group approach such as this can add great value to any training program.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49749097841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49749097841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08858190802188727
DO - 10.1080/08858190802188727
M3 - Article
C2 - 18709584
AN - SCOPUS:49749097841
SN - 0885-8195
VL - 23
SP - 142
EP - 148
JO - Journal of Cancer Education
JF - Journal of Cancer Education
IS - 3
ER -