Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Phase III Trial

Peter Hillmen, Barbara Eichhorst, Jennifer R. Brown, Nicole Lamanna, Susan M. O'Brien, Constantine S. Tam, Lugui Qiu, MacIej Kazmierczak, Keshu Zhou, Martin Šimkovič, Jiří Mayer, Amanda Gillespie-Twardy, Mazyar Shadman, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Peter S. Ganly, Robert Weinkove, Sebastian Grosicki, Andrzej Mital, Tadeusz Robak, Anders ÖsterborgHabte A. Yimer, Tommi Salmi, Meng Ji, Jessica Yecies, Adam Idoine, Kenneth Wu, Jane Huang, Wojciech Jurczak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSEZanubrutinib is a potent, irreversible next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor designed to maximize BTK occupancy and minimize off-target kinase inhibition. We hypothesized that complete/sustained BTK occupancy may improve efficacy outcomes and increased BTK specificity may minimize off-target inhibition-related toxicities.PATIENTS AND METHODSALPINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03734016) is a global, randomized, open-label phase III study of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). The preplanned interim analysis was scheduled approximately 12 months after the first 415 patients were enrolled.RESULTSBetween November 1, 2018, and December 14, 2020, 652 patients were enrolled. We present the interim analysis of the first 415 enrolled patients randomly assigned to receive zanubrutinib (n = 207) or ibrutinib (n = 208). At 15 months of median follow-up, ORR (partial or complete response) was significantly higher with zanubrutinib (78.3%; 95% CI, 72.0 to 83.7) versus ibrutinib (62.5%; 95% CI, 55.5 to 69.1; two-sided P <.001). ORR was higher with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in subgroups with del(17p)/TP53 mutations (80.5% v 50.0%) and del(11q) (83.6% v 69.1%); 12-month progression-free survival in all patients was higher with zanubrutinib (94.9%) versus ibrutinib (84.0%; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.69). Atrial fibrillation rate was significantly lower with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib (2.5% v 10.1%; two-sided P =.001). Rates of cardiac events, major hemorrhages, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation/death were lower with zanubrutinib.CONCLUSIONZanubrutinib had a significantly higher ORR, lower atrial fibrillation rate, and improved progression-free survival and overall cardiac safety profile versus ibrutinib. These data support improved efficacy/safety outcomes with selective BTK inhibition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1035-1045
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 10 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Zanubrutinib Versus Ibrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Interim Analysis of a Randomized Phase III Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this