Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplifi cation and therapy response in the MD anderson phase I clinic

Denis L.F. Jardim, Chad Tang, Debora De Melo Gagliato, Gerald S. Falchook, Kenneth R Hess, Filip Janku, Siqing Fu, Jennifer Jane Wheler, Ralph G Zinner, Aung Naing, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Vijay Kumar Holla, Marylin M. Li, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, Raja Luthra, Ravi Salgia, Razelle Kurzrock, Funda Meric-Bernstam, David S. Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations

Abstract

Results: Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P= 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12;95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%).Nopatient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response.

Conclusion: MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications.

Experimental Design: From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6336-6345
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume20
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplifi cation and therapy response in the MD anderson phase I clinic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this