Gut Microbiome in Patients with Early-Stage and Late-Stage Melanoma

Russell G. Witt, Samuel H. Cass, Tiffaney Tran, Ashish Damania, Emelie E. Nelson, Elizabeth Sirmans, Elizabeth M. Burton, Manoj Chelvanambi, Sarah Johnson, Hussein A. Tawbi, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Michael A. Davies, Christine Spencer, Aditya Mishra, Matthew C. Wong, Nadim J. Ajami, Christine B. Peterson, Carrie R. Daniel, Jennifer A. Wargo, Jennifer L. McQuadeKelly C. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: The gut microbiome modulates the immune system and responses to immunotherapy in patients with late-stage melanoma. It is unknown whether fecal microbiota profiles differ between healthy individuals and patients with melanoma or if microbiota profiles differ among patients with different stages of melanoma. Defining gut microbiota profiles in individuals without melanoma and those with early-stage and late-stage melanoma may reveal features associated with disease progression. Objective: To characterize and compare gut microbiota profiles between healthy volunteers and patients with melanoma and between patients with early-stage and late-stage melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-site case-control study took place at an academic comprehensive cancer center. Fecal samples were collected from systemic treatment-naive patients with stage I to IV melanoma from June 1, 2015, to January 31, 2019, and from healthy volunteers from June 1, 2021, to January 31, 2022. Patients were followed up for disease recurrence until November 30, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Fecal microbiota was profiled by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. Clinical and pathologic characteristics, treatment, and disease recurrence were extracted from electronic medical records. Fecal microbiome diversity, taxonomic profiles and inferred functional profiles were compared between groups. Results: A total of 228 participants were enrolled (126 men [55.3%]; median age, 59 [range, 21-90] years), including 49 volunteers without melanoma, 38 patients with early-stage melanoma (29 with stage I or melanoma in situ and 9 with stage II), and 141 with late-stage melanoma (66 with stage III and 75 with stage IV). Community differences were observed between patients with melanoma and volunteers. Patients with melanoma had a higher relative abundance of Fusobacterium compared with controls on univariate analysis (0.19% vs 0.003%; P <.001), but this association was attenuated when adjusted for covariates (log2 fold change of 5.18 vs controls; P =.09). Microbiomes were distinct between patients with early-stage and late-stage melanoma. Early-stage melanoma had a higher alpha diversity (Inverse Simpson Index 14.6 [IQR, 9.8-23.0] vs 10.8 [IQR, 7.2-16.8]; P =.003), and a higher abundance of the genus Roseburia on univariate analysis (2.4% vs 1.2%; P <.001) though statistical significance was lost with covariate adjustment (log2 fold change of 0.86 vs controls; P =.13). Multiple functional pathways were differentially enriched between groups. No associations were observed between the microbial taxa and disease recurrence in patients with stage III melanoma treated with adjuvant immunotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this case-control study suggest that fecal microbiota profiles were significantly different among patients with melanoma and controls and between patients with early-stage and late-stage melanoma. Prospective investigations of the gut microbiome and changes that occur with disease progression may identify future microbial targets for intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1076-1084
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Dermatology
Volume159
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 18 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group
  • Microbiome Facility

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gut Microbiome in Patients with Early-Stage and Late-Stage Melanoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this