MET abnormalities in patients with genitourinary malignancies and outcomes with c-MET inhibitors

Denis L.F. Jardim, Débora De Melo Gagliato, Gerald Falchook, Ralph G Zinner, Jennifer Jane Wheler, Filip Janku, Vivek Subbiah, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Siqing Fu, Nizar Tannir, Paul Corn, Chad Tang, Kenneth R Hess, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, Razelle Kurzrock, Funda Meric-Bernstam, David S. Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of MET amplification and mutation among GU malignancies and its association with clinical factors and responses to c-MET inhibitors. Patients and Methods Patients with GU malignancies referred to our Phase I Clinical Trials Program were evaluated for MET mutation and amplification and outcomes using protocols with c-MET inhibitors. Results MET amplification was found in 7 of 97 (7.2%) patients (4/27 renal [all clear cell], 1/18 urothelial, and 2/12 adrenocortical carcinoma), with MET mutation/variant in 3 of 54 (5.6%) (2/20 renal cell carcinoma [RCC] [1 clear cell and 1 papillary] and 1/16 prostate cancer). No demographic characteristics were associated with specific MET abnormalities, but patients who tested positive for mutation or amplification had more metastatic sites (median, 4 vs. 3 for wild type MET). Median overall survival after phase I consultation was 6.1 and 11.5 months for patients with and without a MET alteration, respectively (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 6.9; P =.034). Twenty-nine (25%) patients were treated according to a c-MET inhibitor protocol. Six (21%) had a partial response (prostate and RCC) and 10 (34%) had stable disease as best response. Median time to tumor progression was 2.3 months (range, 0.4-19.7) for all treated patients with no responses in patients with a MET abnormality or single-agent c-MET inhibitor treatment. Conclusion MET genetic abnormalities occur in diverse GU malignancies and are associated with a worse prognosis in a phase I setting. Efficacy of c-MET inhibitors was more pronounced in patients without MET abnormalities and when combined with other targets/drugs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e19-e26
JournalClinical Genitourinary Cancer
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • MET amplification
  • MET mutation
  • Prostate cancer
  • Renal cell cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Urology

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MET abnormalities in patients with genitourinary malignancies and outcomes with c-MET inhibitors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this