TY - JOUR
T1 - PTEN in triple-negative breast carcinoma
T2 - protein expression and genomic alteration in pretreatment and posttreatment specimens
AU - Chen, Hui
AU - Ding, Qingqing
AU - Khazai, Laila
AU - Zhao, Li
AU - Damodaran, Senthil
AU - Litton, Jennifer K.
AU - Rauch, Gaiane M.
AU - Yam, Clinton
AU - Chang, Jeffrey T.
AU - Seth, Sahil
AU - Lim, Bora
AU - Thompson, Alastair M.
AU - Mittendorf, Elizabeth Ann
AU - Adrada, Beatriz
AU - Virani, Kiran
AU - White, Jason B.
AU - Ravenberg, Elizabeth
AU - Song, Xingzhi
AU - Candelaria, Rosalind
AU - Arun, Banu
AU - Ueno, Naoto T
AU - Santiago, Lumarie
AU - Saleem, Sadia
AU - Abouharb, Sausan
AU - Murthy, Rashmi K.
AU - Ibrahim, Nuhad
AU - Routbort, Mark J.
AU - Sahin, Aysegul
AU - Valero, Vicente
AU - Symmans, William Fraser
AU - Tripathy, Debu
AU - Wang, Wei Lien
AU - Moulder, Stacy
AU - Huo, Lei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2023.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Background: Recent advances have been made in targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in breast cancer. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a key component of that pathway. Objective: To understand the changes in PTEN expression over the course of the disease in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and whether PTEN copy number variation (CNV) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) can serve as an alternative to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to identify PTEN loss. Methods: We compared PTEN expression by IHC between pretreatment tumors and residual tumors in the breast and lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 96 patients enrolled in a TNBC clinical trial. A correlative analysis between PTEN protein expression and PTEN CNV by NGS was also performed. Results: With a stringent cutoff for PTEN IHC scoring, PTEN expression was discordant between pretreatment and posttreatment primary tumors in 5% of patients (n = 96) and between posttreatment primary tumors and lymph node metastases in 9% (n = 33). A less stringent cutoff yielded similar discordance rates. Intratumoral heterogeneity for PTEN loss was observed in 7% of the patients. Among pretreatment tumors, PTEN copy numbers by whole exome sequencing (n = 72) were significantly higher in the PTEN-positive tumors by IHC compared with the IHC PTEN-loss tumors (p < 0.0001). However, PTEN-positive and PTEN-loss tumors by IHC overlapped in copy numbers: 14 of 60 PTEN-positive samples showed decreased copy numbers in the range of those of the PTEN-loss tumors. Conclusion: Testing various specimens by IHC may generate different PTEN results in a small proportion of patients with TNBC; therefore, the decision of testing one versus multiple specimens in a clinical trial should be defined in the patient inclusion criteria. Although a distinct cutoff by which CNV differentiated PTEN-positive tumors from those with PTEN loss was not identified, higher copy number of PTEN may confer positive PTEN, whereas lower copy number of PTEN would necessitate additional testing by IHC to assess PTEN loss. Trial registration: NCT02276443.
AB - Background: Recent advances have been made in targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in breast cancer. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a key component of that pathway. Objective: To understand the changes in PTEN expression over the course of the disease in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and whether PTEN copy number variation (CNV) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) can serve as an alternative to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to identify PTEN loss. Methods: We compared PTEN expression by IHC between pretreatment tumors and residual tumors in the breast and lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 96 patients enrolled in a TNBC clinical trial. A correlative analysis between PTEN protein expression and PTEN CNV by NGS was also performed. Results: With a stringent cutoff for PTEN IHC scoring, PTEN expression was discordant between pretreatment and posttreatment primary tumors in 5% of patients (n = 96) and between posttreatment primary tumors and lymph node metastases in 9% (n = 33). A less stringent cutoff yielded similar discordance rates. Intratumoral heterogeneity for PTEN loss was observed in 7% of the patients. Among pretreatment tumors, PTEN copy numbers by whole exome sequencing (n = 72) were significantly higher in the PTEN-positive tumors by IHC compared with the IHC PTEN-loss tumors (p < 0.0001). However, PTEN-positive and PTEN-loss tumors by IHC overlapped in copy numbers: 14 of 60 PTEN-positive samples showed decreased copy numbers in the range of those of the PTEN-loss tumors. Conclusion: Testing various specimens by IHC may generate different PTEN results in a small proportion of patients with TNBC; therefore, the decision of testing one versus multiple specimens in a clinical trial should be defined in the patient inclusion criteria. Although a distinct cutoff by which CNV differentiated PTEN-positive tumors from those with PTEN loss was not identified, higher copy number of PTEN may confer positive PTEN, whereas lower copy number of PTEN would necessitate additional testing by IHC to assess PTEN loss. Trial registration: NCT02276443.
KW - ARTEMIS
KW - PTEN
KW - TNBC
KW - copy number
KW - heterogeneity
KW - immunohistochemistry
KW - neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - next-generation sequencing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166934554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85166934554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17588359231189422
DO - 10.1177/17588359231189422
M3 - Article
C2 - 37547448
AN - SCOPUS:85166934554
SN - 1758-8340
VL - 15
JO - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
JF - Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
ER -