TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of expansion cohorts in phase I trials and probability of success in phase II for 381 anticancer drugs
AU - Bugano, Diogo D.G.
AU - Hess, Kenneth
AU - Jardim, Denis L.F.
AU - Zer, Alona
AU - Meric-Bernstam, Funda
AU - Siu, Lillian L.
AU - Razak, Albiruni R.A.
AU - Hong, David S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2017 AACR.
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - Purpose: Evaluate the association between the use of phase I expansion cohorts (ECs) and drug performance in phase II as well as time to approval by the FDA. Experimental Design: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE for single-agent dose-finding adult oncology phase I trials published in 2006 to 2011 and subsequent phase II trials. Successful phase II trials were those that met their primary endpoints. Dates of approval were obtained from the Drugs@FDA website in April 2014. A logistic regression model was used to determine the associations between variables and success in phase II. Results: We identified 533 phase I trials evaluating 381 drugs; 112 drugs had at least one phase I trial with an expansion cohort. Phase I trials with expansion cohorts of two to 20 patients were associated with a higher rate of successful phase II trials than those with no expansion cohort [48% vs. 27%; OR, 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1–4.0; P = 0.037]. Phase II success rates were the same for expansion cohort with two to 20 and more than 20 patients (48% vs. 52%). Other positive associations were disease-specific trials (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0–2.9; P = 0.037), industry sponsorship (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5–5.7; P = 0.0024), and response rate of 6% to 20% (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.6–5.2; P = 0.0007). Drugs tested in phase I trials with expansion cohorts had a higher rate of 5-year approval (19% vs. 5%; HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.2–8.8; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of expansion cohorts in phase I trials was associated with success of subsequent phase II trials. However confounders may play a role in this association.
AB - Purpose: Evaluate the association between the use of phase I expansion cohorts (ECs) and drug performance in phase II as well as time to approval by the FDA. Experimental Design: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE for single-agent dose-finding adult oncology phase I trials published in 2006 to 2011 and subsequent phase II trials. Successful phase II trials were those that met their primary endpoints. Dates of approval were obtained from the Drugs@FDA website in April 2014. A logistic regression model was used to determine the associations between variables and success in phase II. Results: We identified 533 phase I trials evaluating 381 drugs; 112 drugs had at least one phase I trial with an expansion cohort. Phase I trials with expansion cohorts of two to 20 patients were associated with a higher rate of successful phase II trials than those with no expansion cohort [48% vs. 27%; OR, 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1–4.0; P = 0.037]. Phase II success rates were the same for expansion cohort with two to 20 and more than 20 patients (48% vs. 52%). Other positive associations were disease-specific trials (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0–2.9; P = 0.037), industry sponsorship (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5–5.7; P = 0.0024), and response rate of 6% to 20% (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.6–5.2; P = 0.0007). Drugs tested in phase I trials with expansion cohorts had a higher rate of 5-year approval (19% vs. 5%; HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.2–8.8; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The use of expansion cohorts in phase I trials was associated with success of subsequent phase II trials. However confounders may play a role in this association.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027161468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027161468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2354
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2354
M3 - Article
C2 - 28377482
AN - SCOPUS:85027161468
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 23
SP - 4020
EP - 4026
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 15
ER -