Validation of HER2 amplification as a predictive biomarker for anti- epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Kanwal Raghav, Jonathan Michael Loree, Jeffrey Morris, Michael J. Overman, Ruoxi Yu, Funda Meric-Bernstam, David Menter, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Brian Kee, Andrea Muranyi, Shalini Singh, Mark Routbort, Ken Chen, Kenna R.M. Shaw, Riham Katkhuda, Kandavel Shanmugam, Dipen Maru, Marwan Fakih, Scott Kopetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose HER2 amplification has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti- epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (anti-EGFRabs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The purpose of the study was to validate the predictive impact of HER2 amplification in mCRC. Patients and Methods We analyzed patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC across two distinct cohorts. In cohort 1 (n = 98), HER2 amplification was tested in tumor tissue using dual in situ hybridization (HER2 amplification: HER2/CEP17 ratio, 2.0 or greater). Cohort 2 (n = 70) included 16 patients with HER2 amplification and 54 HER2 nonamplified controls identified by next-generation sequencing (HER2 amplification: four or more copies) who had received prior anti-EGFRabs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with anti-EGFRab therapy, which was estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results Median PFS in cohort 1 on anti-EGFRab-based therapy was significantly shorter in patients with HER2 amplification compared with HER2 nonamplified patients (2.8 v 8.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 7.05; 95% CI, 3.4 to 14.9; P < .001). These findings were validated in cohort 2 (median PFS for HER2 amplified v nonamplified: 2.8 v 9.3 months, respectively; HR, 10.66; 95% CI, 4.5 to 25.1; P < .001). The median PFS on therapy without anti-EGFRabs was similar among HER2-amplified and nonamplified patients in both cohort 1 (9.7 v 11.1 months, respectively; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4; P = .97) and cohort 2 (9.6 v 11.3 months, respectively; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1; P = .66). In multivariable analyses, HER2 amplification emerged as a single independent predictor of poor PFS on anti-EGFRab therapy in both cohort 1 (HR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; P < .001) and cohort 2 (HR, 10.1; 95% CI, 4.3 to 23.9; P < .001). Conclusion HER2 amplification in RAS/RAF wild-type mCRC seems to be a predictive biomarker for lack of efficacy of anti-EGFRab therapy. Screening patients with RAS/ BRAF wild-type mCRC for HER2 amplification should be considered before anti- EGFRab treatment to guide therapy and to identify patients for early referral to clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalJCO Precision Oncology
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group
  • Bioinformatics Shared Resource

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of HER2 amplification as a predictive biomarker for anti- epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this